The figure library
Figures you can trust — and cite
The data figures that run through the site, collected in one place. Every value traces to a named trial or an FDA label — forest plots, effect sizes, reported rates. No stock imagery, no decorative filler.
11 evidence charts · every value trial- or label-verified
Evidence charts
Source-backed data figures — every value traces to a trial or label.
The Peptide Evidence Ladder
The 8-rung ladder every graded answer on this site runs on.
Framework from “The Peptide Era.”
Used on: How we grade evidence, The evidence ladder
Download figure ↓Lean vs fat loss on a GLP-1
Most of the weight lost is fat, but a meaningful share is lean mass — which is why protein and resistance training matter.
DEXA substudies, SURMOUNT-1 and STEP 1.
Used on: Muscle loss, Ozempic face
Download figure ↓How much people actually lose (STEP 1)
Response varies widely — half of people lost 15%+, but a real tail lost under 5%.
STEP 1 (semaglutide 2.4 mg), 68 weeks.
Used on: Non-responders
Download figure ↓How long it takes to work
The average loss keeps building for months before it levels off.
STEP 1 and SURMOUNT-1 verified time-points.
Used on: How long it takes, Plateau
Download figure ↓Oral vs injectable weight loss
The pills work — a bit less than the strongest injections, across separate (not head-to-head) trials.
ATTAIN-1, OASIS 4, STEP 1, SURMOUNT-1.
Used on: Oral semaglutide, Orforglipron
Download figure ↓“Natural Ozempic” vs the real thing
The supplement effects are tiny or null — and none work on the GLP-1 receptor.
RCTs and supplement meta-analyses; note the different units.
Used on: Natural Ozempic, graded
Download figure ↓Hair-loss rates from the labels
Real but uncommon — and it tracks the rapid weight loss more than the drug itself.
Wegovy and Zepbound FDA labels.
Used on: Hair loss
Download figure ↓The 2026 coverage landscape
Coverage is expanding at big employers but still uneven — and increasingly gated behind lifestyle programs.
KFF employer survey and state Medicaid data, 2024–2025.
Used on: Coverage cliff 2026, Cost & access
Download figure ↓Outcomes beyond weight loss
The strongest non-weight benefits: fewer heart and kidney events in dedicated outcome trials.
SELECT and FLOW trials.
Used on: Beyond weight loss
Download figure ↓Cancer signals, in context
Most cancer signals are null or protective; the thyroid signal is small and uncertain.
Observational cohorts and RCT meta-analyses.
Used on: Cancer risk
Download figure ↓GLP-1s and the birth-control pill
Tirzepatide can lower oral-contraceptive absorption; semaglutide does not — an under-discussed interaction.
FDA label pharmacokinetic data.
Used on: Birth control, Periods & fertility
Download figure ↓
Figures are from “The Peptide Era” and its companion site, free to view and quote with attribution. They are educational, not medical advice.